4.7 Article

Evaluating the impact of using digital soil mapping products as input for spatializing a crop model: The case of drainage and maize yield simulated by STICS in the Berambadi catchment (India)

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 406, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115503

Keywords

Soil mapping; Soil functions; Digital soil assessment; Crop model; Machine learning; Uncertainty analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. project ATCHA [ANR-16-CE03-0006]
  2. Environmental Research Observatory M-TROPICS - University of Toulouse
  3. IRD
  4. CNRS-INSU
  5. SUJALA III project (Karnataka Watershed Development Department and World Bank)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) can serve as an alternative data source for spatializing crop models, and the study found that DSM products outperformed traditional soil maps in providing spatial estimates of STICS soil parameters. While the errors on STICS' yearly outputs induced by DSM estimations of soil parameters were generally low, they were significant for years with high impacts of soil variations.
Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) can be an alternative data source for spatializing crop models over large areas. The objective of the paper was to evaluate the impact of DSM products and their uncertainties on a crop model's outputs in an 80 km(2) catchment in south India. We used a crop model called STICS and evaluated two essential soil functions: the biomass production (through simulated yield) and water regulation (via calculated drainage). The simulation was conducted at 217 sites using soil parameters obtained from a DSM approach using either Random Forest or Random Forest Kriging. We first analysed the individual STICS simulations, i.e., at two cropping seasons for 14 individual years, and then pooled the simulations across years, per site and crop season. The results show that i) DSM products outperformed a classical soil map in providing spatial estimates of STICS soil parameters, ii) although each soil parameters were estimated separately, the correlations between soil parameters were globally preserved, ii) Errors on STICS' yearly outputs induced by DSM estimations of soil parameters were globally low but were important for the few years with high impacts of soil variations, iii) The statistics of the STICS simulations across years were also affected by DSM errors with the same order of magnitude as the errors on soil inputs and iv) The impact of DSM errors was variable across the studied soil parameters. These results demonstrated that coupling DSM with a crop model could be a better alternative to the classical Digital Soil Assessment techniques. As such, it will deserve more work in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available