4.7 Article

A framework for triple oxygen isotopes in speleothem paleoclimatology

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 319, Issue -, Pages 191-219

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2021.11.002

Keywords

Triple oxygen isotopes; Carbonate speleothem; Terrestrial paleoclimatology; Meteoric water; Western USA

Funding

  1. University of Michigan
  2. NSF [1702271, 0903093]
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [0903093, 1702271] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Speleothem oxygen isotope records are important for understanding late Quaternary terrestrial paleoclimate changes. This study developed a framework using triple oxygen isotope distributions in speleothems to refine interpretations of the records. By analyzing speleothem data, the study identified the influence of cave kinetic processes and hydrologic processes on oxygen isotope values.
Speleothem oxygen isotope (delta O-18) records provide key insight into the rate and timing of terrestrial paleoclimate changes during the late Quaternary. However, it can be difficult to deconvolve the delta O-18 signal into individual components, which include processes related to moisture source, moisture transport, temperature, precipitation amount, infiltration, and the cave environment. We developed a framework that uses triple oxygen isotope distributions in speleothems to refine interpretations of delta O-18 speleothem records. This framework identifies the influence of dominant processes on delta O-18 values through time by their characteristic (although not necessarily unique) trends in Delta'O-17 vs. delta'O-18 space, where Delta'O-17 = delta('17O) - 0.528 delta O-'18 and delta('x) O = ln(delta(x) O + 1). Following Guo and Zhou (2019a), we expect that 'cave kinetic' processes (e.g., fast degassing at the drip site, prior calcite precipitation) will drive positive trends between delta'O-18 and Delta'O-17. In contrast, we can identify hydrologic processes from near-horizontal trends that reflect Rayleigh-type meteoric water processes and negative trends driven by changes in evaporation processes at the moisture source region or at the cave site, mineralization temperature, and seasonality in precipitation/infiltration amount. We applied this framework to four western USA speleothems from Cave of the Bells (Arizona), Leviathan Cave (Nevada), and Lehman Caves (Nevada). The Cave of the Bells and Leviathan data have nearhorizontal to negative trends indicating delta O-18 variability was driven largely by changes in Rayleigh distillation of atmospheric moisture and moisture source conditions, supporting prior interpretations. We analyzed two Lehman Caves records because they were likely influenced by non-equilibrium processes and the data show weak to moderate negative trends. For sample LMC-12b, chosen for its extreme 7.5% delta O-18 range, the trend is statistically distinct from the near-horizontal Rayleighprocess trend and most consistent with changes in local evaporation intensity and infiltration seasonality as primary drivers. None of these records displays a positive covariation slope between delta'O-18 O and Delta'O-17, suggesting limited variability in cave kinetic processes through time or unknown limitations to the kinetic model of Guo and Zhou (2019a). Additionally, reconstructed formation waters for all sites fall near the Delta'O-17 vs. delta'O-18 Local Meteoric Water Line, a correlation we suggest as a novel test of the absolute magnitude of isotopic offset due to cave kinetic processes. More broadly, our framework adds context to the only other study of carbonate speleothem triple oxygen isotope composition (Sha et al., 2020). We find that positive to negative Delta'O-17 vs. delta'O-18 trends likely exist in speleothem data that may reasonably be expected from regional climate processes and that, combined with other proxy data, triple oxygen isotope data will be useful in constraining interpretations of delta O-18(speleothem) records. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available