4.7 Article

Ca-Sr isotope and chemical evidence for distinct sources of carbonatite and silicate mantle metasomatism

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 312, Issue -, Pages 158-179

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2021.08.004

Keywords

Carbonatite metasomatism; Silicate metasomatism; Ca isotopes; Sr isotopes; Mantle xenolith; Peridotite; Spitsbergen

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41773009, 41873002]
  2. Programme National de Planetologie (PNP) of CNRS/INSU/CNES
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences President's International Fellowship Initia-tive (PIFI) [2017VCA0009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Light rare earth element enrichments in mantle peridotites without enrichments in high-field-strength elements are commonly attributed to inputs from carbonate-rich melts known as 'carbonatite' metasomatism. This study compared models of silicate and carbonatite metasomatism in peridotites and found distinct chemical signatures between the two, with carbonatite metasomatism potentially yielding the lowest Ca-isotope values. High Sr content and Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios may serve as indicators of carbonatite metasomatism in mantle rocks.
Enrichments in light REE without concomitant enrichments in high-field-strength elements in mantle peridotites are usu-ally attributed to inputs from carbonate-rich melts and referred to as 'carbonatite' metasomatism as opposed to interaction with evolved silicate melts. Alternatively, both enrichment types are ascribed to percolating volatile-bearing mafic liquids whose chemical signatures evolve from 'silicate' to 'carbonatite'. Here we compare these models for peridotites in which these enrichment types are combined, as may be common in the mantle. We report new Ca-Sr-Nd isotope and chemical data for lherzolite and harzburgite xenoliths from Spitsbergen that were metasomatized, first, by silicate, then by carbonate-rich melts that formed carbonate-bearing pockets replacing earlier minerals. Seven crushed samples were treated with acetic acid that dissolved carbonates formed in the latest event, but not silicates. The leachates (acid-removed carbonates making up 0.6-1.4% of total sample mass) contain much more Sr than the residues after leaching (277-2923 vs. 16-60 ppm), have a greater overall Sr-87/Sr-86 range (0.7049-0.7141 vs. 0.7036-0.7055) and higher Sr-87/Sr-86 in each sample than the residues. The leachates have lower delta Ca-44/40 range (0.17-0.68%) than the residues (0.78-1.00%), as well as lower delta Ca-44/40 than the residues in all samples but one. By and large, the carbonates are out of Ca-Sr isotope equilibrium with the host peridotites implying that the older silicate and younger carbonatite metasomatism were produced by different parental melts, thus sup-porting the existence of distinctive carbonate-rich metasomatic media in the lithospheric mantle, possibly including recycled materials. The delta Ca-44/40 in the leachates (i.e. carbonates, 0.17-0.68%) are well below bulk silicate Earth (BSE) estimates (0.94 +/- 0.05%) and delta Ca-44/40 in non-metasomatized melt-depleted mantle. Yet, delta Ca-44/40 in the non-leached whole rock (WR) carbonate-bearing samples (0.75-0.95%) fall within, or are only slightly lower than, the BSE range. The Sr-87/Sr-86 range in these WR samples (0.7030-0.7112) includes very high values for peridotites with large aggregates of dolomite and Mg-calcite. It appears that both carbonatite and silicate metasomatism may produce 8.44/40Ca values lower than the BSE such that Ca-isotope data cannot robustly tell apart these two enrichment types, yet carbonatite metasomatism may yield the lowest delta Ca-44/40. Carbonates, even at small mass fractions, are significant hosts of Sr in the WR Spitsbergen peridotites (8-51 wt.% of Sr mass) because of very high Sr concentrations, but add little to WR Ca balance (3-12 wt.%). As a result, high Sr content and Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios may be indices (though not definitive proofs) of carbonatite metasomatism in mantle rocks. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available