4.7 Article

A panel of platelet-associated circulating long non-coding RNAs as potential biomarkers for colorectal cancer

Journal

GENOMICS
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages 31-37

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.11.026

Keywords

CRC; Tumor-educated platelets; Circulating RNA; LncRNA; Diagnostics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82073110, 81301756]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province [Y22H209332]
  3. Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province [2018KY116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified a panel of platelet-associated long non-coding RNAs that were upregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, both in platelets and serum, serving as potential biomarkers for CRC diagnostics. Results showed that the expression levels of LNCAROD and TSPOAP-AS1 were correlated with cancer staging and tumor location.
Evidence has suggested the potential of tumor-educated platelets as a biomarker trove for cancer diagnostics, but the difficulty in isolation limits its application. Since most of the circulating RNAs are derived from platelets, the change of RNA profile in platelets may lead to altered RNA expression in serum. Here, we identified a panel of platelet-associated long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and evaluated its diagnostic capacity in serum of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Four lncRNAs, LNCAROD, SNHG20, LINC00534, and TSPOAP-AS1, were upregulated in both platelets and serum of CRC patients. A binary logistic model derived from them has validated area under roc curve of 0.78 indicating great performance. Furthermore, the expression levels of LNCAROD and TSPOAP-AS1 were correlated with cancer staging and tumor location. Together, our results add novel lncRNA biomarkers to the list of blood tests for CRC diagnostics and provide molecular evidence for the cross-talk between CRC platelets and serum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available