4.6 Article

Evaluating the impact of in silico predictors on clinical variant classification

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 924-930

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.018

Keywords

ACMG/AMP guidelines; ClinGen; In silico tools; Variant classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

According to the ACMG/AMP guidelines, in silico evidence plays a significant role in the strength level of pathogenic and benign evidence. The study found that these criteria are commonly used and can impact variant classification outcomes. When appropriate thresholds are established, these criteria can be used effectively at a moderate strength level.
Purpose: According to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Medical Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines, in silico evidence is applied at the supporting strength level for pathogenic (PP3) and benign (BP4) evidence. Although PP3 is commonly used, less is known about the effect of these criteria on variant classification outcomes. Methods: A total of 727 missense variants curated by Clinical Genome Resource expert groups were analyzed to determine how often PP3 and BP4 were applied and their impact on variant classification. The ACMG/AMP categorical system of variant classification was compared with a quantitative point-based system. The pathogenicity likelihood ratios of REVEL, VEST, FATHMM, and MPC were calibrated using a gold standard set of 237 pathogenic and benign variants (classified independent of the PP3/BP4 criteria). Results: The PP3 and BP4 criteria were applied by Variant Curation Expert Panels to 55% of missense variants. Application of those criteria changed the classification of 15% of missense variants for which either criterion was applied. The point-based system resolved borderline classifications. REVEL and VEST performed best at a strength level consistent with moderate evidence. Conclusion: We show that in silico criteria are commonly applied and often affect the final variant classifications. When appropriate thresholds for in silico predictors are established, our results show that PP3 and BP4 can be used at a moderate strength. (C) 2021 by American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available