4.7 Article

Syngas production by chemical looping co-gasification of rice husk and coal using an iron-based oxygen carrier

Journal

FUEL
Volume 309, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122100

Keywords

Chemical looping; Co-gasification; Syngas; Rice husk; Coal

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52006096]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the chemical looping co-gasification of rice husk and coal using iron ore as an oxygen carrier, revealing significant synergistic effects between the two fuels under specific conditions, leading to increased carbon conversion efficiency and gasification efficiency.
The chemical looping co-gasification (CLCG) of rice husk and coal using iron ore as an oxygen carrier was carried out in a fixed bed reactor. The effects of different parameters including oxygen/carbon ratio, reaction temperature, steam flow rate, and rice husk blending ratio on the gasification performance were studied. Based on the carbon conversion efficiency, gasification efficiency, and gas yield, the optimal conditions of the CLCG of rice husk and coal were determined. Moreover, the synergistic effect in carbon conversion and syngas production between those two fuels was also analyzed. The results showed that the carbon conversion efficiency, gasification efficiency, and gas yield reached 88.16%, 49.23%, 1.14 Nm(3)/kg, respectively at the oxygen/carbon ratio of 0.2, the reactor temperature of 900 degrees C, the steam flow rate of 0.125 g/min, and the rice husk blending ratio of 50%. At this condition, there were significant synergistic effects between rice husk and coal during the CLCG process, and the synergistic rate for carbon conversion efficiency and gasification efficiency reached 21.54% and 3.62%, respectively. The SEM-EDX analysis showed that adding coal to rice husk could alleviate the ash deposition phenomenon on the surfaces of iron ore during the CLCG process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available