Life cycle assessment of a farmed wood butanol-gasoline blend as an alternative transport fuel for passenger cars

The objective of this study is to investigate the environmental profile of farmed pine wood butanol blended with gasoline in a volumetric ratio of 30% and to compare the results with neat gasoline as a fossil reference fuel. To this end, the well-to-wheel approach has been chosen as it encompasses the entire fuel life cycle, i.e. the total fuel production chain including fuel use in the vehicle, while the vehicle manufacturing and infrastructure-related processes are excluded. The well-to-wheel analysis focuses on the biochemical production path in Germany for the years 2018 and 2040, considering different electricity generation mixes for the butanol production process and different fuel consumption and emission factors from passenger car operation in both years. The results, based on 16 midpoint impact categories of the ILCD2.0 life cycle impact assessment method, show that for the total fuel production and use stage, the butanol-gasoline blend has a higher environmental impact than the reference fuel. The main processes causing environmental impacts can be identified in the fuel production and related upstream stages. Regarding the use stage of the fuels, the butanol-gasoline blend reveals lower environmental impacts than the fossil gasoline reference fuel, as the biofuel blend reduces several tailpipe emission components like particulate matter. However, these reductions do not mitigate the total well-to-wheel impacts compared to fossil gasoline because fuel production and its upstream processes have a more significant impact. The analysis closes by highlighting several measures with a strong potential to improve the total environmental profile of the butanol-gasoline blend.

Automated summary

This study investigates the environmental profile of farmed pine wood butanol blended with gasoline in a volumetric ratio of 30% compared to neat gasoline as a fossil reference fuel. The analysis shows that while the production stage of the blend has higher environmental impacts, the use stage presents lower impacts compared to fossil gasoline due to reduced tailpipe emissions.