4.7 Article

Distribution of rare earth elements and other critical elements in beneficiated Pennsylvania anthracites

Journal

FUEL
Volume 304, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121400

Keywords

Lanthanides; Critical elements; Lithium; Coal; Beneficiation; Macerals

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy contract [DE-FE0029007]
  2. 111 project [B17042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Pennsylvania Anthracite Fields, historically a significant coal mining area, now mainly focuses on surface mining of remaining pillars from underground mining. Geochemical studies show differentiation in coal products, with refuse samples containing enriched mineral elements.
The Pennsylvania Anthracite Fields are in a complex tectonic and metamorphic terrain, historically hosting one of the largest concentrations of coal mining in the USA. Anthracite mining now largely consists of the surface mining of the pillars remaining from the prime years of underground mining. The geochemical study of the sized coal products and the refuse (largely rock) from three preparation plants (breakers) demonstrates that Principal components analysis (PCA) of select major oxide, minor element, and rare earth elements illustrates some differentiation among the products from the individual plants. The rock samples, with abundant quartz and metamorphic Al-Si minerals and with a lower ash-basis REE concentration than the coals, were distinctly separated from the coal samples on the PCA plots. Plots of Gd-N/Gd-N* vs. Eu-N/Eu-N* and Ce-N/Ce-N* vs. Eu-N/Eu-N* showed differentiation between the individual suites of coals showed that the refuse samples had distinct REE distributions compared to the associated coals. Several minor and trace elements show enrichments in the coal samples. Lithium, with concentrations of up to 314 ppm on an ash basis, is among the most promising of the critical elements, exceeding the enrichment of the REY and Sc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available