4.7 Article

Comparison of setups for measuring the viscosity of coal ash slags for entrained-flow gasification

Journal

FUEL
Volume 307, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121777

Keywords

Coal ash; Slag viscosity; Gasification; Slag mineralogy

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [392218733]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) of China [22078352]
  3. NSFC-DFG grant [21761132032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared viscosity measurement techniques for coal ash and process slag from an entrained-flow gasifier under reducing conditions. Analysis including XRF, XRD, and SEM-EDX was performed, with results compared to thermochemical predictions. The coal slag exhibited Newtonian behavior depending on crystallization, while the process slag showed shear-thinning behavior with high viscosity.
A coal ash and a process slag from an entrained-flow gasifier were analyzed by two institutes in their respective workflow to compare viscosity measurement techniques under reducing conditions. Several analyses were carried out to characterize the samples, including X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy with an energy-dispersive X-ray detector (SEM-EDX). The results are compared to the phases predicted based on thermochemical calculations. A coal slag (S1) was analyzed as exhibiting Newtonian behavior by one institute, while it showed shear-thickening behavior at another institute due to crystallization. This was confirmed by XRD and SEM-EDX. In contrast to previous studies, the sample in this work was still glassy at a low shear rate. The phase compositions of the crystallized slags were in good agreement with thermochemical predictions. The process slag (S2) sample showed shear-thinning behavior but was of very high viscosity, meaning that the measurement was restricted by instrumental limitations. The chemical compositions of the slags obtained after viscosity measurements indicated contamination with crucible material (Mo) for S1, while the composition of S2 was the same before and after viscosity measurements. The overall relative difference in the measurements considering both measurement routines and both samples was +/- 22%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available