4.7 Article

Unraveling catalytic properties by yttrium promotion on mesoporous SBA-16 supported nickel catalysts towards CO2 methanation

Journal

FUEL
Volume 317, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122829

Keywords

CO2 methanation; Synthetic natural gas; Ni catalyst; SBA-16; Yttrium promotion

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [892571]
  3. MSCA-IF
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [892571] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Promoted Ni/Y/SBA-16 catalysts exhibited enhanced catalytic performance in CO2 methanation, with the catalyst promoted with 10 wt% Y showing the best activity. The improved performance was attributed to increased reducibility of nickel species, higher surface oxygen species, and the presence of moderate basic sites caused by yttrium promotion.
The ordered mesoporous silica SBA-16 with high specific surface area and pore volume was synthesized and used to prepare Ni/SBA-16 catalysts promoted with yttrium. These promoted catalysts were tested in CO2 methanation reaction and characterized by N-2 sorption, small-angle/wide-angle XRD, TEM, XPS, H2-TPR, CO2-TPD, and TGA/DSC-MS. The results revealed that Ni/Y/SBA-16 catalysts performed better catalytic performance in CO2 methanation compared to the non-promoted Ni/SBA-16 catalyst. The best catalytic activity was found for the catalyst promoted with 10 wt% Y. The improved performance of such catalysts was attributed to the increase of reducibility of nickel species, the increase in surface oxygen species, and the abundance of moderate basic sites caused by Y promotion. Furthermore, the CO2 reaction rate and turnover frequency of CO2 were well correlated with the number of moderate basic sites. Finally, all the tested catalysts are highly stable during the 8 h time-on stream catalytic test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available