4.5 Review

Future Therapeutic Strategies for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

Journal

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.741918

Keywords

gait disorders; dopamine agents; deep brain stimulation; non-invasive stimulation; physical therapy; repurposing; problem solving; humans

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council Leadership Fellowship [1195830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Freezing of gait is a common and challenging clinical symptom in Parkinson's disease. Developing individualized and on-demand therapies through improved detection and wearable technologies, as well as an integrated collaborative research approach, are essential for investigating new therapeutic avenues for effective treatment.
Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and challenging clinical symptom in Parkinson's disease. In this review, we summarise the recent insights into freezing of gait and highlight the strategies that should be considered to improve future treatment. There is a need to develop individualised and on-demand therapies, through improved detection and wearable technologies. Whilst there already exist a number of pharmacological (e.g., dopaminergic and beyond dopamine), non-pharmacological (physiotherapy and cueing, cognitive training, and non-invasive brain stimulation) and surgical approaches to freezing (i.e., dual-site deep brain stimulation, closed-loop programming), an integrated collaborative approach to future research in this complex area will be necessary to systematically investigate new therapeutic avenues. A review of the literature suggests standardising how gait freezing is measured, enriching patient cohorts for preventative studies, and harnessing the power of existing data, could help lead to more effective treatments for freezing of gait and offer relief to many patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available