4.7 Article

The effects of ultrasonic treatment on physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of semigelatinized high amylose maize starch

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106831

Keywords

Ultrasonication; In vitro digestibility; Semigelatinization; High amylose maize starch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High- and low-temperature ultrasonication enhanced the short-range ordered molecular structure and apparent amylose content of semigelatinized high amylose maize starch. High-temperature ultrasonication increased slowly digestible starch and resistant starch, while low-temperature ultrasonication only decreased resistant starch.
This study aimed to observe and quantify the high- and low-temperature ultrasonication impact of semigelatinized high amylose maize starch on physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility. High- and lowtemperature ultrasonication did not increase the degree of gelatinization, but generated cracks and pores on the starch granule surface and enhanced the short-range ordered molecular structure and apparent amylose content (AAC). Compared with incubation treatments, high-temperature ultrasonication gradually increased the slowly digestible starch (SDS) and resistant starch (RS), whereas low-temperature ultrasonication only decreased RS. Principal component analysis (PCA) and multivariate linear regression results showed that SDS and RS were significantly affected by the long-range ordered molecular structure, a molecular weight distribution of amylopectin, enthalpy change and AAC, whereas the short-range ordered molecular structure further dominated RS. Our results improved the understanding of physicochemical property changes in low- and high-temperature ultrasonication on semigelatinized high amylose maize starch and differentiated the significant principal components of SDS and RS formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available