4.7 Article

Testing barrier materials in the development of a biosecurity pen to protect broilers against Campylobacter

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108172

Keywords

Biosecurity; Campylobacter; Broiler; Poultry; Barrier

Funding

  1. Food Institute Research Measure [15/F/641]
  2. Teagasc Walsh Scholarship Programme [2017262]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that a biosecurity pen infrastructure based on galvanised steel mesh panels surrounded by polyurethane film or flyscreen mesh was effective at protecting commercial broiler flocks from Campylobacter colonisation. Further validation is needed before full implementation.
Previous studies demonstrated that commercial broiler flocks could be protected from Campylobacter colonisation using a bird pen, termed the biosecurity cube, constructed from four polycarbonate sheets (1m high x 2.5m long x 6 mm thick) supported at the corners by 4 x 1m high wooden columns. However, this design had issues with airflow and potential for upscaling. A biosecurity cube composed of four galvanised steel mesh panels (3.44m long x 1.25m high) was therefore developed onto which different barrier materials, preventing contact between the test birds and the main flock, were attached. The objective of this study was to test a range of barrier materials including cardboard, wire mesh, polyurethane film and later (at the suggestion of broiler industry personnel) flyscreen mesh. Initial studies suggested that while the cardboard and wire mesh were ineffective, the polyurethane film protected the birds. Further validation (over 2 separate trials, 7 cubes for each barrier material) demonstrated that polyurethane and flyscreen mesh were effective. It was concluded that a biosecurity pen infrastructure based on galvanised steel mesh panels surrounded by polyurethane film or flyscreen mesh was effective at protecting the birds from Campylobacter but upscaling studies will be undertaken before full implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available