4.7 Article

Colorimetric detection of Aflatoxin B1 by using smartphone-assisted microfluidic paper-based analytical devices

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108497

Keywords

Paper-based analytical devices; Starch-iodine; Colorimetric; Smartphone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduced a method for rapid detection of Aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) using microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (mu PADs), which exhibited superior detection performance in actual food samples and met the testing requirements of countries like China.
Aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) is a powerful carcinogen, and the pollution it causes has become a global public health safety issue. Therefore, microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (mu PADs) with smartphones to read colorimetric signals were constructed for rapid AFB(1) detection. The colorimetric mechanism of mu PADs was based on the common starch-iodine reaction, and the addition of gelatin/chitosan enhanced the colorimetric effect. During detection and analysis, the competitive analysis occurred in the process of AFB(1) monoclonal antibody's recognition of free AFB(1) and functionalized antigen. The glucose oxidase-labeled IgG was used as the secondary antibody. Hydrogen peroxide, an oxidation product of the glucose, caused a chroma change in mu PADs. Simultaneously, the change in chroma was consistent with the change in AFB1 concentration. Under the best optimized conditions, the limits of detection and quantitation of AFB(1) in the buffer were 9.45 and 12.00 ng mL(-1), respectively. A comparison of the detection performance of commercial kits with that of the method introduced herein confirmed the superiority of our method in actual food samples with known AFB(1) concentrations. This colorimetric mu PADs analysis met the detection requirements of some countries, such as China, and had great potential for development in the direction of daily extensive food safety control and environmental monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available