4.7 Article

Measurement of Flow Characteristics in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Using Electrostatic Sensor Arrays

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2016.2514698

Keywords

Bubbling fluidized bed; electrostatic sensor; liquid antistatic agent (LAA); solids velocity; time and frequency domain analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61403138, 21236007, 21525627]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2012CB215203]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education [B13009]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities
  5. North China Electric Power University, China [2014QN13]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F061307/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/F061307/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluidized beds are widely applied in a range of industrial processes. In order to maintain the efficient operation of a fluidized bed, the flow parameters in the bed should be monitored continuously. In this paper, electrostatic sensor arrays are used to measure the flow characteristics in a bubbling fluidized bed. In order to investigate the electrostatic charge distribution and the flow dynamics of solid particles in the dense region, time and frequency domain analysis of the electrostatic signals is conducted. In addition, the correlation velocities and weighted average velocity of Geldart A particles in the dense and transit regions are calculated, and the flow dynamics of Geldart A and D particles in the dense and transit regions are compared. Finally, the influence of liquid antistatic agents on the performance of the electrostatic sensor array is investigated. According to the experimental results, it is proved that the flow characteristics in the dense and transit regions of a bubbling fluidized bed can be measured using electrostatic sensor arrays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available