4.7 Article

NMR-based metabolomics approach on optimization of malolactic fermentation of sea buckthorn juice with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 366, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130630

Keywords

Fermentation; Lactiplantibacillus; Lactic acid bacteria; NMR; Metabolomics; Hippophae rhamnoides

Funding

  1. Graduate School of the University of Turku
  2. Finnish Food Research Foundation
  3. Niemi foundation
  4. Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation
  5. OLVI foundation
  6. TOP foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that adjusting the acidity of the juice, fermentation time, and strain selection have a significant impact on flavor modification during fermentation. Different metabolites in the juice are affected by fermentation under different pH conditions, and if deacidification is the goal, strains producing less acids and consuming sugars should be chosen.
This work investigated the impact of malolactic fermentation on the metabolomic profile of sea buckthorn juice to optimize the fermentation process for flavor modification. Six strains of L. plantarum were used with varied pH of the juice, cell acclimation, and fermentation time. 1H-NOESY spectra were acquired from fresh and fermented juices with a total of 46 metabolites identified. Less sugars and quinic acid were metabolized at pH 2.7 while oxidation of ascorbic acid was reduced at pH 3.5. L-Malic acid, essential amino acids, and nucleosides were consumed early during fermentation while sugars in general were consumed later in the fermentation. If deacidification is the main target of fermentation, strains that produce less acids and ferment less sugars, shorter fermentation time, and lower starter pH should be used. Higher starter pH and longer fermentation time promote formation of antimicrobial compounds and potentially increase antioxidant stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available