4.7 Article

Probability Density Functions of Stationary Surface EMG Signals in Noisy Environments

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT
Volume 65, Issue 7, Pages 1547-1557

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2016.2534378

Keywords

Electromyography (EMG); Gaussian distributions; noise measurement; probability density function (pdf); signal analysis; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

Funding

  1. Prince of Songkla University (PSU)
  2. Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program [PHD/0155/2554]
  3. National Electronics and Computer Technology Center-PSU Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, PSU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The probability density function (pdf) of an electromyography (EMG) signal provides useful information for choosing an appropriate feature extraction technique. The pdf is influenced by many factors, including the level of contraction force, muscle type, and noise. In this paper, we investigated the pdfs of noisy EMG signals artificially contaminated with five different noise types: 1) Electrocardiography (ECG) interference; 2) many spurious background spikes; 3) white Gaussian noise; 4) motion artifact; and 5) power line interference at various levels of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In addition, we evaluated a set of statistical descriptors for identifying a noisy EMG signal from its pdf, specifically kurtosis, negentropy, L-kurtosis, and robust measures of kurtosis (KR1 and KR2). The results show that at low SNR (<5 dB), all noise types affect the statistical descriptors for the pdf of a noisy EMG signal. In addition, KR2 performs the best among these descriptors in identifying a noisy EMG signal from its pdf, because it is computed based on the quantiles of the data. As a result, it can avoid the effects of outliers resulting in the correct identification of pdf shape of noisy EMGs with all contamination types and all levels of SNR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available