4.4 Article

Monoclonal antibodies against the newly identified allergen β-enolase from common carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Journal

FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 129-149

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2022.2028741

Keywords

beta-enolase; common carp; monoclonal antibodies; cross-reactivity; allergen extracts

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund [01.2.2-LMTK-718-01-0008]
  2. Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beta-enolase is a newly identified allergen in common carp. It was cloned from common carp muscle tissue and expressed in E. coli. Recombinant beta-enolase was reactive with blood serum samples of fish-allergic patients. Monoclonal antibodies generated against beta-enolase showed cross-reactivity with beta-enolases of other organisms.
beta-enolase is a heat-labile fish allergen identified in different fish species. In this study, beta-enolase gene was cloned from common carp muscle tissue and the target protein was expressed as a fusion with maltose binding protein (MBP-Eno) in E. coli. Recombinant MBP-Eno was reactive with blood serum specimens of fish-allergic patients, confirming that beta-enolase is a newly identified allergen of common carp. Two monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against recombinant beta-enolase were generated that showed cross-reactivity with beta-enolases of other organisms. Both antibodies recognized beta-enolases from other fish species extracts, while MAb 6E4 showed a broad reactivity with pork, chicken, yeast, and E. coli samples. Epitope mapping using MBP-Eno variants revealed that beta-enolase region comprising amino acids 623-698 presumably includes MAb 6E4 epitope. The generated broadly reactive MAb 6E4 directed against a conserved epitope of beta-enolases may represent a valuable tool for the characterization of allergen extracts and fish allergy diagnostics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available