4.5 Article

A novel theoretical strategy for modeling viscosity of polymer melts: Modified friction theory with PC-SAFT

Journal

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
Volume 550, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113262

Keywords

Polymer melts; Viscosity; Friction theory; PC-SAFT

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776046, 21978047]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242020K40033]
  3. Six Talent Climax Foundation of Jiangsu [XCL-079]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposed a modified friction theory (f-theory) combined with perturbed-chain statistical association fluid theory (PC-SAFT) to model the dynamic viscosity of polymer melts under high pressure and shear rate. Viscosity data points were collected and analyzed, with the modified f-theory showing good modeling performance based on fitting to experimental viscosity data.
Despite its importance, the role of pressure in the viscosity of polymer melts is little known. A modified friction theory (f-theory) combined with perturbed-chain statistical association fluid theory (PC-SAFT) was proposed to model the dynamic viscosity of polymer melts under high pressure and shear rate. Viscosity data points were collected from literature and analyzed. Different estimation strategies for PC-SAFT parameters for polymers were assessed from the perspective of molecular weight. The resulted appropriate parameters were used to calculate the attractive and repulsive pressures of the polymers, and the pressures were then used as inputs of both linear friction model and modified f-theory for viscosity modeling. The parameters of two models were obtained by fitting to the experimental viscosity data. The overall average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of the modified f-theory for viscosity modeling is 4.42%, which indicates the good modeling performance of the modified f-theory. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available