4.5 Article

Merging dynamics of dual parallel linear diffusion flames

Journal

FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103490

Keywords

Flame merging; Merging probability; Merging flame height; Aspect ratio; Entraining air

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51876148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the merging characteristics of two identical linear diffusion flames, finding that the merging probability and merging flame height are related to flame spacing and heat release rate. A new dimensionless heat release rate parameter is proposed, and it is observed that decreasing entrained air from the ground facilitates flame merging. The merging flame height is determined by the competition of buoyancy and pressure difference, and can be correlated with the effective entrainment perimeter and dimensionless heat release rate.
The merging of flames is a widely observed fire phenomenon in building and wildland fires. This work explores the merging characteristics of two identical linear diffusion flames. The duel parallel linear burners are used (dimensions of 100 mm x 4 mm and 200 mm x 2 mm), and the heat release rate (HRR) of each buoyancy-driven flame varies from 0.7 to 10.9 kW. The flame merging probability and merging flame height are quantified under different spacing of burners and HRRs. A new dimensionless HRR involving the aspect ratio is proposed to determine the merging probability. Moreover, decreasing the entrained air from the ground promotes the flame merging, which can be reflected by an increase of dimensionless HRR. The merging flame height is determined by the competition of buoyancy and pressure difference around the flame, which can be correlated by the effective entrainment perimeter and the dimensionless HRR. Such a correlation can also be used to explain the flame merging phenomena with different HRRs and aspect ratios in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available