4.1 Article

The Analysis Status of Σ+ p Scattering Events in the J-PARC E40 Experiment

Journal

FEW-BODY SYSTEMS
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00601-021-01698-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [23684011, 15H00838, 15H05442, 15H02079, 18H03693]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Technology (MEXT) Japan [24105003, 18H05403]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23684011, 15H02079, 18H03693, 15H05442, 15H00838, 18H05403] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The J-PARC E40 experiment aims to measure cross sections of Sigma p scatterings, verify characteristics of Sigma(+) p interaction, and conduct systematic study. The experiment was conducted in June 2020 at J-PARC, generating Sigma(+) particles through a specific reaction and measuring with detector systems.
The J-PARC E40 experiment aims for measuring cross sections of the Sigma p scatterings with high statistics by overcoming difficulties of hyperon-nucleon scattering experiment. The physics motivations are to verify the large repulsive force due to quark Pauli effect in the Sigma(+) p interaction and to perform systematic study of the Sigma N interaction. Physics data taking was performed at the K1.8 beam line in the J-PARC hadron experimental facility by 2020 June. Sigma(+) particles were produced via the pi(+)p -> K+Sigma(+) reaction and their momenta were tagged with spectrometers. Recoil proton of the Sigma(+) p scatterings and proton from the Sigma(+) -> p pi(0) decay were detected with surrounding detector system CATCH. The Sigma(+) p scattering can be identified by checking the consistency for the recoil proton between the measured energy and the calculated energy from kinematics of the Sigma(+) p scattering. In present analysis, 69M Sigma(+) particles are tagged as the Sigma(+) beam and 4500 Sigma(+) p scattering events are identified. Further analysis to derive the differential cross sections is ongoing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available