Journal
EYE
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 297-302Publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01875-6
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the role of color vision in identifying individuals at high risk of developing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The results showed that color vision was frequently abnormal in the unaffected eyes of patients with unilateral nAMD. However, abnormal color contrast sensitivity (CCS) did not predict the development of nAMD within the study period, suggesting that it is not a viable screening tool for this pathology.
Background Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a leading cause of blind registrations in the elderly. Unfortunately, it is difficult to detect the early stage of the disease, when treatment is more likely to be successful. Subjects with very early disease are likely to have abnormal macular function, even in the pre-symptomatic stage. In this study, colour vision was evaluated to establish if subjects at high risk of developing nAMD can be identified, thus allowing earlier diagnosis and possible treatment. Methods Colour contrast sensitivity (CCS) was evaluated over time in the fellow unaffected eye of subjects with unilateral nAMD. Participants were divided into Group 1 (182 participants) or Group 2 (15 participants) according to whether nAMD did not or did develop in the study period respectively and the two groups were compared. Results CCS was increased (i.e. worse colour vision) compared with the age-matched reference range in a high proportion of fellow eyes in both Groups 1 and 2. Global mean CCS values did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference between mean Group 1 CCS values and the last CCS value prior to nAMD diagnosis from Group 2 subjects. Conclusion This study shows that in patients with unilateral nAMD, colour vision is frequently abnormal in the fellow unaffected eye. Abnormal CCS does not predict the development of nAMD within the 12 month period of the study and therefore it is not a viable screening tool for this pathology.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available