4.4 Article

Willingness to receive a booster dose of inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine in Taizhou, China

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 261-267

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2016401

Keywords

COVID-19; willingness; booster dose; China

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study in Taizhou, China revealed that the majority of participants were willing to receive a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Factors such as history of allergic reactions, confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness, and personal characteristics were significantly associated with willingness to accept the booster dose.
Purpose This population-based study aimed to determine the willingness to receive a booster dose of vaccine against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Taizhou, China. Methods An online questionnaire investigation addressing participants' willingness to receive a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine was organized in Taizhou, China. Of the 2318 interviewees who received the invitation, 1576 finished a qualifying questionnaire, corresponding to a response rate of 68.0%. Results The majority of respondents (n = 1435 [91.1%]) were willing to accept a booster vaccination against COVID-19. History of allergic reaction to other vaccines (OR = 0.30), confidence in the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines (OR = 3.20), confidence in the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 2.25) and its variants (useful versus [vs.] useless, OR = 2.33), and vaccine recipients (OR = 3.09) remained significantly associated with willingness to accept a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusion A moderate proportion of the participants who responded were willing to receive a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. These results are valuable for starting health education and interventions to accelerate vaccine uptake and improve public health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available