4.3 Article

Agreement of anterior segment measurements between four diagnostic imaging devices in myopic patients

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 1235-1243

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.2012153

Keywords

Agreement; anterior chamber depth; anterior segment measurements; central corneal thickness; comparison; device interchangeability; keratometry; white-to-white

Funding

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Lexington Avenue, New York, NY

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the inter-device agreement of various eye measurements and indicates that different instruments have interchangeable capabilities for measuring ACD, CCT, K1, K2, Delta K, and WTW, with each device having its own strengths in certain measurements.
Purpose To compare the inter-device agreement of anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), corneal astigmatism (Delta K), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements. Methods This is a retrospective study with 73 myopic patients (142 eyes). We extracted and compared anterior segment measurements (ACD, CCT, K1, K2, Delta K, and WTW) of four devices (OPD-Scan III, Pentacam HR, Lenstar LS 900, and Galilei G4), and performed pairwise agreement comparisons between them. Results Agreement analyses revealed that the most agreement occurred: in Pentacam HR and Galilei G4 for ACD measurements, in Pentacam HR and Lenstar LS 900 for CCT measurements, in OPD-Scan III and Galilei G4 for WTW measurements, in OPD-Scan III and Pentacam HR for K1 and K2 measurements, and OPD-Scan III and Galilei G4 for Delta K measurements. Conclusion OPD-Scan III is interchangeable with both Galilei G4 and Lenstar LS 900 for WTW measurements. OPD-Scan III and the Pentacam-HR are interchangeable in K1, K2, and Delta K measurements. OPD-Scan III and Lenstar LS 900, and OPD-Scan III and Galilei G4 are interchangeable in K1 and Delta K measurements, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available