4.5 Article

Real-life experience of treating HCV co-infection among HIV-infected population in Egypt: single-center experience

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 789-795

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2004117

Keywords

HCV; HIV; Sofosbuvir; Daclatasvir; Real-world

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that DAAs are effective and safe for treating HCV in PLHIV, with social stigma potentially being a major barrier to follow-up visits.
Background Liver disease has emerged as a leading cause of death among PLHIV coinfected with HCV. Methods A retrospective study involving all HCV viremic patients coinfected with HIV who presented to HCV/HIV multidisciplinary clinics located at Embaba fever hospital. Patients were assigned to receive DAAs according to the national treatment guidelines. The primary endpoint was SVR12. Results Of the 519 patients enrolled, 38.73% LTFU; either not initiated (n = 170) or did not complete the treatment (n = 31). The main identified reasons behind LTFU were schedule conflict (19%) or hospitalization (13%). Among 318 patients who completed their DAAs course, nine patients had a relapse after the end of treatment and 97% had attained SVR12. There were significant differences among different virological response groups in baseline factors including smoking (p = 0.005), history of dental procedure (p = 0.007), CD4 count (p = 0.007), and HIV viral load (p = <0.001). Among responders (n = 309), there was a significant reduction of baseline hemoglobin and significant improvement of baseline platelets (p = 0.005) at on-treatment week 8. Baseline necro-inflammatory markers showed significant improvement across follow-up time points (p < 0.001). Conclusions DAAs are an effective and safe choice to treat HCV in PLHIV. Social stigma could be a major cause for lacking adherence to follow-up visits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available