4.3 Review

PARP inhibitors: clinical relevance and the role of multidisciplinary cancer teams on drug safety

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 541-551

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.1996561

Keywords

PARP inhibitors; olaparib; rucaparib; niraparib; talazoparib; adverse effects; multidisciplinary cancer teams

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer is a devastating cause of death and the development of PARP inhibitors has provided new hope in cancer therapy. While these drugs have targeted action, close monitoring of adverse effects and the involvement of multidisciplinary cancer teams are crucial for successful treatment outcomes.
Introduction Cancer is considered one of the most devastating causes of death for humanity. Innovative and targeted therapies have become urgent in the treatment of this large subset of diseases. Over the last decade, the development of PARP (poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase) inhibitors has emerged as a new target in cancer therapy. Areas covered The authors conducted a review focusing on the clinic relevance and adverse effects of the four drugs already approved by drug regulatory agencies, namely: olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib and talazoparib. Despite the targeted action of this drug class, the adverse effects should be carefully monitored for the adequate safety of cancer patients taking them. The role of multidisciplinary cancer teams is crucial to help more and more patients to benefit from these revolutionary agents. Expert opinion PARP (poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase) inhibitors are drugs with great potential in the treatment of several types of cancer. However, their toxicity profiles often lead to treatment interruption or early discontinuation. The daily monitoring of these cancer patients by multidisciplinary cancer teams is essential for the success of therapy and for the promotion of a better quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available