4.6 Article

Low Weber number droplet impact on heated hydrophobic surfaces

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2021.110503

Keywords

Droplet impact; Contact line; Heat transfer; Bubble entrapment; IR thermography

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [80NSSC20K0072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates low Weber number droplet impact on heated hydrophobic surfaces and analyzes the heat transfer mechanisms and factors influencing it, with the formation of bubbles during impact being a unique feature. The influence of surface roughness on heat transfer is quantified.
This study investigates low Weber number droplet impact on heated hydrophobic surfaces. Using synchronized high-speed optical and infrared (IR) imaging, we correlate the droplet dynamics to the spatial distribution of the solid-liquid interfacial temperature, heat flux, and the total heat transfer to the droplet. The total transferred heat of a completely rebounding droplet is also modeled analytically. Denoting the drop diameter and impact velocity as D and v, we find that the total transferred heat Q scales as D1.25v, which is validated using experiments. A unique feature of low-We droplet impact on non-wetting surfaces is the formation of a sub-millimetric entrapped bubble that forms during receding. The substrate temperature in the bubble region is significantly higher than the surrounding area due to the low thermal conductivity of air. Right after the bubble forms, the local heat flux remains stable at the inner contact line (bubble contact line), but decreases at the retracting primary outer contact line. As a result, the local heat flux at the inner contact line becomes increasingly important as the droplet recedes. Nonetheless, the overall heat transfer is reduced by 5.6% and 7.1% at surface temperatures of 50 degrees C and 65 degrees C, respectively, as the entrapped bubble reduces the total liquid-solid interface area. The influence of surface roughness on the heat transfer is also quantified. Droplets on the rough surface have a smaller maximum spreading diameter, leading to a smaller heat transfer area and lower heat transfer rate. Moreover, the average heat flux on the rough surface is also lower compared to the smooth surface, indicating a larger interfacial thermal resistance of the rough surface. Overall, the findings highlight the dominance of thermal conduction (as compared to convection or evaporation) as the prominent mode of heat transfer during droplet impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available