4.5 Article

Comparison of different methods to isolate mouse limbal epithelial cells

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108767

Keywords

Limbal epithelial cells; Limbal stem cells; Mouse; Isolation method

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared four different methods for isolating mouse limbal epithelial cells and found that methods 2, 3, and 4 yielded better results in terms of cell yield, percentage of single cells, and number of limbal epithelial stem/progenitor cells. These three methods are recommended for isolating heterogeneous-LSCs from mouse corneas.
Limbal stem cells (LSCs) are the stem cell reservoir for corneal epithelium. The protocol to isolate LSCs from human cornea has been examined and optimized. However, the isolation protocol has not been optimized for mouse cornea, which is crucial for the downstream cell analysis. Here we compared four different isolation methods evolved from the previous reports to obtain mouse limbal epithelial cells which are heterogeneous and contain LSCs in a single-cell suspension: (1) the dissected limbal rim was cut into pieces and digested by 10-cycle incubation in trypsin; (2) after the removal of corneal epithelium by a rotating bur, the remaining eyeball was incubated in dispase at 4 degrees C for overnight to obtain limbal epithelial sheet, followed by trypsin digestion into a single-cell suspension; (3) same as method 2 except that the incubation was in dispase at 37 degrees C for 2h and an additional collagenase incubation at 37 degrees C for 20 min; (4) same as method 3 except that the corneal epithelium was punctured by a 1.5 mm trephine instead of being removed by a rotating bur. Method 1 showed the lowest cell yield, the lowest percentage of single cells, and the lowest number of limbal epithelial stem/progenitor cells in the harvested cells among the four methods, thus not a recommended protocol. Method 2, 3, and 4 isolated a comparable number of K14(+) and p63 alpha-bright stem/progenitor cells per eye. The remaining eye globe after cell collection in the three methods showed a complete removal of limbal epithelium albeit different extent of corneal and limbal stromal digestion. Among the three methods, method 2 showed a higher cell viability than method 4; method 3 yielded the lowest cell number; method 4 led to the highest percentage of single cells in cell suspension. Results suggest that method 2, 3, and 4 are preferred methods to isolate heterogeneous-LSCs from mouse corneas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available