4.6 Article

Investigation of miR-126-3p loaded on adipose stem cell-derived exosomes for wound healing of full-thickness skin defects

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 362-374

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exd.14480

Keywords

adipose stem cell exosome; full-thickness skin defect; miR-126-3p; wound healing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that ADSC-derived exosomal miR-126-3p promotes wound healing of full-thickness skin defects by targeting PIK3R2, increasing collagen deposition and the formation of new blood vessels.
Objective To investigate the function of miR-126-3p loaded on adipose stem cell (ADSC)-derived exosomes (ADSC-Exos) in wound healing of full-thickness skin defects. Methods ADSCs transfected with miR-126-3p mimic, miR-126-3p inhibitor or pcDNA3.1-PIK3R2, or PKH26-marked ADSC-Exos were cultured with fibroblasts or human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The proliferation and migration rates of fibroblasts and angiogenesis of HUVECs were measured. Rats with full-thickness skin defects were injected with ADSC-Exos or exosomes extracted from ADSCs transfected with miR-126-3p inhibitor and the wound healing rates were measured. The wound bed, collagen deposition and angiogenesis in injured rats were assessed. Results ADSC-Exos could be ingested by fibroblasts and HUVECs. Co-incubation with ADSCs or ADSC-Exos promoted the proliferation and migration of fibroblasts and angiogenesis of HUVECs, which was further enhanced by miR-126-3p overexpression. Inhibition of ADSC-Exos or miR-126-3p or PIK3R2 overexpression suppressed the proliferation and migration of fibroblasts and angiogenesis of HUVECs. ADSC-derived exosomal miR-126-3p increased wound healing rate, collagen deposition and newly formed vessels in the injured rats. Conclusion ADSC-derived exosomal miR-126-3p promotes wound healing of full-thickness skin defects by targeting PIK3R2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available