4.6 Article

The two-domain architecture of LAMP2A regulates its interaction with Hsc70

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 411, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112986

Keywords

Chaperone-mediated autophagy; Expanded genetic codes; Lysosomes; Photo-crosslinking; Protein assembly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the direct interaction between Hsc70 and LAMP2A in chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), as well as the significance of the two-domain architecture of the lumenal domains of LAMP2A in this interaction.
Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) is a unique proteolytic pathway, in which cytoplasmic proteins recognized by heat shock cognate protein 70 (Hsc70/HSPA8) are transported into lysosomes for degradation. The substrate/chaperone complex binds to the cytosolic tail of the lysosomal-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP2A), but whether the interaction between Hsc70 and LAMP2A is direct or mediated by other molecules has remained to be elucidated. The structure of LAMP2A comprises a large lumenal domain composed of two domains, both with the beta-prism fold, a transmembrane domain and a short cytoplasmic tail. We previously reported the structural basis for the homophilic interaction of the lumenal domains of LAMP2A, using site-specific photo-crosslinking and/or steric hindrance within cells. In the present study, we introduced a photo-crosslinker into the cytoplasmic tail of LAMP2A and successfully detected its crosslinking with Hsc70, revealing this direct interaction for the first time. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the truncation of the membrane-distal domain within the lumenal domain of LAMP2A reduced the amount of Hsc70 that coimmunoprecipitated with LAMP2A. Our present results suggested that the two-domain architecture of the lumenal domains of LAMP2A underlies the interaction with Hsc70 at the cytoplasmic surface of the lysosome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available