Genetic diversity and disease: The past, present, and future of an old idea

Why do infectious diseases erupt in some host populations and not others? This question has spawned independent fields of research in evolution, ecology, public health, agriculture, and conservation. In the search for environmental and genetic factors that predict variation in parasitism, one hypothesis stands out for its generality and longevity: genetically homogeneous host populations are more likely to experience severe parasitism than genetically diverse populations. In this perspective piece, I draw on overlapping ideas from evolutionary biology, agriculture, and conservation to capture the far-reaching implications of the link between genetic diversity and disease. I first summarize the development of this hypothesis and the results of experimental tests. Given the convincing support for the protective effect of genetic diversity, I then address the following questions: (1) Where has this idea been put to use, in a basic and applied sense, and how can we better use genetic diversity to limit disease spread? (2) What new hypotheses does the established disease-diversity relationship compel us to test? I conclude that monitoring, preserving, and augmenting genetic diversity is one of our most promising evolutionarily informed strategies for buffering wild, domesticated, and human populations against future outbreaks.

Automated summary

The article explores the relationship between genetic diversity and disease spread, highlighting the protective effect of genetic diversity against severe parasitism. The author summarizes the development of this hypothesis and experimental tests, as well as proposing applications of genetic diversity in limiting disease spread and new hypotheses to test in the future. Monitoring, preserving, and augmenting genetic diversity is identified as a promising strategy for buffering populations against future outbreaks.