4.5 Review

Evidence for infection in intervertebral disc degeneration: a systematic review

Journal

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 414-430

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07062-1

Keywords

Bacteria; Degenerate disc; Intervertebral disc; Microbe; Modic change

Funding

  1. Versus Arthritis [22467]
  2. NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Back pain is associated with intervertebral disc degeneration and bacterial infection, with Cutibacterium acnes identified in pathological disc material. Some studies may be biased, and further research using newer methods is needed.
Purpose Back pain is a major problem worldwide and is linked to intervertebral disc degeneration and Modic change. Several studies report growth of bacteria following extraction of degenerate discs at spine surgery. A pathophysiological role for infection in back pain has been proposed. Method We conducted a PRISMA systematic review. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched with the terms Modic change, intervertebral dis*, bacteria, microb*, and infect*. Date limits of 2001-2021 were set. Human studies investigating the role of bacteria in disc degeneration or Modic change in vertebrae were included. Results Thirty-six articles from 34 research investigations relating to bacteria in human degenerate discs were found. Cutibacterium acnes was identified in pathological disc material. A 'candidate bacterium' approach has been repeatedly adopted which may have biased results to find species a priori, with disc microbial evidence heavily weighted to find C. acnes. Conclusion Evidence to date implicates C. acnes identified through culture, microscopy and sequencing, with some suggestion of diverse bacterial colonisation in the disc. This review found studies which used culture methods and conventional PCR for bacterial detection. Further agnostic investigation using newer methods should be undertaken.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available