4.6 Article

Static mucus impairs bacterial clearance and allows chronic infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the cystic fibrosis rat

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01032-2021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1K08HL131867]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK072482]
  3. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [R464-CF, ROWE19R0, BIRKET20A0-KB]
  4. Crossref Funder Registry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aberrant mucus in cystic fibrosis airway allows for persistent P. aeruginosa infection in the lungs.
Cystic fibrosis airway disease is characterised by chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Successful eradication strategies have been hampered by a poor understanding of the mechanisms underlying conversion to chronicity. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance receptor (CFTR)-knockout (KO) rat harbours a progressive defect in mucociliary transport and viscosity. KO rats were infected before and after the appearance of the mucus defect, using a clinical mucoid-isolate of P. aeruginosa embedded in agarose beads. Young KO rats that were exposed to bacteria before the development of mucociliary transport defects resolved the infection and subsequent tissue damage. However, older KO rats that were infected in the presence of hyperviscous and static mucus were unable to eradicate bacteria, but instead had bacterial persistence through 28 days post-infection that was accompanied by airway mucus occlusion and lingering inflammation. Normal rats responded to infection with increased mucociliary transport to supernormal rates, which reduced the severity of a second bacterial exposure. We conclude that the aberrant mucus present in the CF airway permits persistence of P. aeruginosa in the lung.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available