4.6 Article

Biomarker signatures for progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01181-2021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1147776, APP1066128]
  2. Centre of Research Excellence in Pulmonary Fibrosis [GNT116371]
  3. NHMRC, Lung Foundation Australia
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Roche Products Pty Ltd
  6. (Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia)
  7. Lung Foundation Australia
  8. Foundation Partners Roche Products Pty Ltd
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim - Medical Research Council [G0901226]
  10. GlaxoSmithKline RD [CRT114316]
  11. Nottingham University
  12. Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  13. NIHR Research Professorship [RP-2017-08-ST2-014]
  14. National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Fellowship [CS-2013-13-017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the prognostic role of serum biomarkers in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in three independent cohorts. Circulatory biomarkers were found to provide valuable clinical assistance in predicting disease progression and survival risk in IPF patients.
Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease in which circulatory biomarkers have the potential for guiding management in clinical practice. We assessed the prognostic role of serum biomarkers in three independent IPF cohorts: Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry (AIPFR), Trent Lung Fibrosis (TLF) and Prospective Observation of Fibrosis in the Lung Clinical Endpoints (PROFILE). Methods In the AIPFR cohort, candidate proteins were assessed by ELISA as well as in an unbiased proteomic approach. LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression was used to restrict the selection of markers that best accounted for the progressor phenotype at 1 year in the AIPFR cohort, and subsequently prospectively selected for replication in the validation TLF cohort and assessed retrospectively in the PROFILE cohort. Four significantly replicating biomarkers were aggregated into a progression index model based on tertiles of circulating concentrations. Results 189 participants were included in the AIPFR cohort, 205 participants from the TLF cohort and 122 participants from the PROFILE cohort. Differential biomarker expression was observed by ELISA and replicated for osteopontin, matrix metallopeptidase-7, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and periostin for those with a progressor phenotype at 1 year. Proteomic data did not replicate. The progression index in the AIPFR, TLF and PROFILE cohorts predicted risk of progression, mortality and progression-free survival. A statistical model incorporating the progression index demonstrated the capacity to distinguish disease progression at 12 months, which was increased beyond the clinical GAP (gender, age and physiology) score model alone in all cohorts, and significantly so within the incidence-based TLF and PROFILE cohorts. Conclusion A panel of circulatory biomarkers can provide potentially valuable clinical assistance in the prognosis of IPF patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available