4.7 Article

Automated detection and segmentation of intracranial hemorrhage suspect hyperdensities in non-contrast-enhanced CT scans of acute stroke patients

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 2246-2254

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08352-4

Keywords

CT; Acute stroke; Hyperdense volume; Blood; Artificial intelligence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that an AI-based algorithm showed high sensitivity and specificity in detecting acute intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) and intraparenchymal hemorrhages (IPH) in non-contrast-enhanced head CT scans of suspected acute stroke patients. The algorithm also exhibited strong agreements with neuroradiology residents in detecting ICH and IPH. Additionally, excellent agreement was found between the algorithm and the reference standard in quantifying IPH volumes.
Objectives Artif icial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis is increasingly applied in the acute stroke field. Its implementation for the detection and quantification of hemorrhage suspect hyperdensities in non-contrast-enhanced head CT (NCCT) scans may facilitate clinical decision-making and accelerate stroke management. Methods NCCTs of 160 patients with suspected acute stroke were analyzed regarding the presence or absence of acute intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) using a novel AI-based algorithm. Read was performed by two blinded neuroradiology residents (R1 and R2). Ground truth was established by an expert neuroradiologist. Specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve were calculated for ICH and intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) detection. IPH-volumes were segmented and quantified automatically by the algorithm and semi-automatically. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dice coefficient (DC) were calculated. Results In total, 79 of 160 patients showed acute ICH, while 47 had IPH. Sensitivity and specificity for ICH detection were 0.91 and 0.89 for the algorithm; 0.99 and 0.98 for R1; and 1.00 and 0.98 for R2. Sensitivity and specificity for IPH detection were 0.98 and 0.89 for the algorithm; 0.83 and 0.99 for R1; and 0.91 and 0.99 for R2. Interreader reliability for ICH and IPH detection showed strong agreements for the algorithm (0.80 and 0.84), R1 (0.96 and 0.84), and R2 (0.98 and 0.92), respectively. ICC indicated an excellent (0.98) agreement between the algorithm and the reference standard of the IPH-volumes. The mean DC was 0.82. Conclusion The AI-based algorithm reliably assessed the presence or absence of acute ICHs in this dataset and quantified IPH volumes precisely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available