4.3 Article

Enhancing the performance of the counter-propagating dual-beam optical trap with the asymmetric configuration

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL D
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00333-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61975237, 11904405]
  2. Scientific Research Project of National University of Defense Technology [ZK20-14]
  3. Independent Scientific Research Project of National University of Defense Technology [ZZKY-YX-07-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents two types of asymmetric counter-propagating dual-beam optical traps with different numerical aperture and trapping power. These traps can eliminate the multi-equilibrium positions that occur when the two foci of the trap are not coincided. The asymmetric dual-beam trap exhibits significantly higher axial and transverse trapping stiffness and width compared to the standard dual-beam trap with the same or higher average numerical aperture. This asymmetric dual-beam optical trap has important implications for precision measurement, basic physics, and biomaterials research.
The trapping stiffness and width are two important parameters to characterize a counter-propagating dual-beam optical trap. We present two types of asymmetric counter-propagating dual-beam optical trap with the different numerical aperture (NA) and trapping power to eliminate the multi-equilibrium positions when two foci of the optical trap are not coincided. Meanwhile, the asymmetric dual-beam trap with the different NA enhances the axial trapping width and stiffness over five and three times, respectively, higher than the standard dual-beam trap with the higher and same average NA. Besides, it increases the transverse trapping stiffness when two foci are not coincided. The asymmetric dual-beam optical trap will benefit the future applications for the study of precision measurement, basic physics and biomaterials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available