4.7 Article

Bulk observables at 5.02 TeV using quasiparticle anisotropic hydrodynamics

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 81, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09832-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at the Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University [2021-089-CED]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0013470]
  3. IAU Scientific and High Performance Computing Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on experimental data, 3+1D quasiparticle anisotropic hydrodynamics can well describe bulk observables in 5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions, especially showing excellent descriptive capability for the momentum dependence of K/pi and p/pi ratios in the 0-5% centrality class reported by the ALICE collaboration.
We compare predictions of 3+1D quasiparticle anisotropic hydrodynamics (aHydroQP) for a large set of bulk observables with experimental data collected in 5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. We make predictions for identified hadron spectra, identified hadron average transverse momentum, charged particle multiplicity as a function of pseudorapidity, the kaon-to-pion (K/pi) and proton-to-pion (p/pi) ratios, identified particle and charged particle elliptic flow, and HBT radii. We compare to data collected by the ALICE collaboration in 5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. We find that, based on available data, these bulk observables are well described by aHydroQP with an assumed initial central temperature of T-0 = 630 MeV at tau(0) = 0.25 fm/c and a constant specific shear viscosity of eta/s = 0.159, which corresponds to a peak specific bulk viscosity of zeta/s = 0.048. In particular, we find that the momentum dependence of the kaon-to-pion (K/pi) and proton-to-pion (p/pi) ratios reported recently by the ALICE collaboration are extremely well described by aHydroQP in the 0-5% centrality class.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available