4.7 Article

Spatially homogeneous black hole solutions in z=4 Horava-Lifshitz gravity in (4+1) dimensions with Nil geometry and H2 x R horizons

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 81, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09622-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we present two new families of spatially homogeneous black hole solutions for Horava-Lifshitz Gravity equations with general coupling constant. The horizons are modeled on two types of Thurston 3-geometries and are neither spherical, hyperbolic, nor toroidal, representing a unique type of black hole solution. Using the Hamiltonian formalism, we establish the conventional thermodynamics of the solutions defining the mass and entropy of the black hole solutions.
In this paper, we present two new families of spatially homogeneous black hole solution for z = 4 Horava-Lifshitz Gravity equations in (4+ 1) dimensions with general coupling constant. and the especial case lambda = 1, considering beta = -1/3. The three-dimensional horizons are considered to have Bianchi types I I and I I I symmetries, and hence the horizons are modeled on two types of Thurston 3-geometries, namely the Nil geometry and H-2 x R. Being foliated by compact 3-manifolds, the horizons are neither spherical, hyperbolic, nor toroidal, and therefore are not of the previously studied topological black hole solutions in Horava-Lifshitz gravity. Using the Hamiltonian formalism, we establish the conventional thermodynamics of the solutions defining the mass and entropy of the black hole solutions for several classes of solutions. It turned out that for both horizon geometries the area term in the entropy receives two non-logarithmic negative corrections proportional to Horava-Lifshitz parameters. Also, we show that choosing some proper set of parameters the solutions can exhibit locally stable or unstable behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available