4.7 Article

Shadows and precession of orbits in rotating Janis-Newman-Winicour spacetime

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10045-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SCOAP3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a rotating Janis-Newman-Winicour (JNW) naked singularity spacetime is constructed using the Newman-Janis Algorithm (NJA). The shadows cast by the rotating JNW naked singularity are studied and compared with the shadows cast by the Kerr black hole. It is found that the shadow of the rotating naked singularity can be distinguished from the shadow of the Kerr black hole. Additionally, the precession of timelike bound orbits in rotating JNW spacetime is analyzed and a negative precession is observed, which is not present in the Kerr black hole case. These novel signatures of the shadow and orbital precession in rotating JNW naked singularity spacetime could be important in the context of recent astronomical observations.
In this paper, we construct the rotating Janis-Newman-Winicour (JNW) naked singularity spacetime using Newman-Janis Algorithm (NJA). We analyse NJA with and without complexification methods and find that the energy conditions do satisfied when we skip the complexification step. We study the shadows cast by rotating JNW naked singularity and compare them with the shadows cast by the Kerr black hole. We find that the shadow of the rotating naked singularity can be distinguished from the shadow of the Kerr black hole. While we analyse the precession of timelike bound orbits in rotating JNW spacetime, we find that it can have a negative (or opposite) precession, which is not present in the Kerr black hole case. These novel signatures of the shadow and orbital precession in rotating JNW naked singularity spacetime could be important in the context of the recent observation of the shadow of the M87 galactic center and the stellar dynamics of 'S-stars' around Milkyway galactic center.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available