Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 33-42Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.09.005
Keywords
Blood pressure; Carotid endarterectomy; Conventional carotid endarterectomy (cCEA); Eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA); Sympathetic nervous activity
Categories
Funding
- Australian Government
- Government of Western Australia
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Both eversion and conventional CEA techniques do not result in clinically significant long term changes in blood pressure. Concerns related to the transection of the carotid sinus nerve during eversion CEA could not be supported.
Objective: Blood pressure (BP) management is a vital aspect of stroke prevention and post-stroke care. Different surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) techniques may impact on BP control post-operatively. Specifically, the carotid sinus nerve, which innervates the carotid baroreceptors and carotid body, is commonly left intact during conventional CEA but is routinely transected as part of eversion CEA. The aim of this study was to assess long term BP control after eversion and conventional CEA. Methods: Patients from the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS cohort) and a personal series of patients from the Stroke Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL cohort) were separately analysed and divided into eversion and conventional CEA groups. Mixed effect linear models were fitted and adjusted for baseline demographic data and antihypertensive treatment to test for changes in BP from baseline over a three year follow up period after the respective procedures. Results: There were no differences in changes in baseline BP readings and follow up readings between eversion and conventional CEA in the ICSS or UCL cohorts. In the ICSS cohort a mild but significant systolic (-8.6 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.6 - -6.6) and diastolic (-4.9 mmHg; 95% CI -6.0 - -3.8) BP lowering effect was evident at discharge in the conventional group but not in the eversion CEA group. BP monitoring during follow up did not reveal any consistent BP changes with either conventional or eversion CEA vs. baseline levels. Conclusion: Neither conventional nor eversion CEA seem to result in clinically significant long term BP changes. Potential concerns related to either short or long term alterations in BP levels with transection of the carotid sinus nerve during eversion CEA could not be substantiated.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available