4.4 Article

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. passiflorae isolates display variable virulence in Passiflora edulis Sims seedlings

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 2, Pages 465-476

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-021-02417-2

Keywords

Fusarium wilt; Yellow passion fruit; Inoculation; Isolate pathogenicity; Aggressiveness

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [421033/2018-5]
  2. macroprogram of Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura [22.16.04.007.00.00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic variability among Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. passiflorae (FOP) isolates affects their aggressiveness, with isolate CMF3115 being the most aggressive in this study. This isolate also showed high levels of chlamydospores in roots, suggesting potential for screening Passiflora germplasm for resistance to FOP.
Genetic variability among Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. passiflorae (FOP) isolates changes their aggressiveness pattern under controlled conditions. This study aimed at assessing the aggressiveness of FOP isolates in Passiflora edulis seedlings through survival analysis as well as anatomic analyses of infected roots. The study followed a completely randomized design with nine FOP isolates used to inoculate 30 P. edulis seedlings. Data were subjected to survival analysis based on Kaplan-Meier curves. The number of chlamydospores in the roots was counted through root clarification and microscopy. The incidence of wilted plants ranged from 20% to 90% of the isolates with an average of 50%. Isolate CMF3115 was the most aggressive with 70% of dead plants up to 70 d.a.i. and only 3% of plants surviving the disease. Although this outcome is possibly not correlated to mortality, this isolate was also responsible for large numbers of chlamydospores in roots. Thus, CMF3115 has the potential to be used for Passiflora germplasm screening under controlled conditions and may contribute to the selection of P. edulis cultivars resistant to FOP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available