4.7 Review

Two-echelon vehicle routing problems: A literature review

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 304, Issue 3, Pages 865-886

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.02.022

Keywords

Routing; Two-echelon vehicle routing; Literature review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The two-echelon vehicle routing problem (2E-VRP) involves splitting the distribution network into two levels. This review examines the literature on 2E-VRP, including mathematical formulations, solution methods, and benchmark datasets, emphasizing the academic and practical significance of 2E-VRP.
In the two-echelon vehicle routing problem (2E-VRP), the distribution network is split into two echelons. Different vehicles are operated on the first and second echelon to maintain economies of scale and ad-here to any vehicle restrictions that may be present in either echelon. Intermediate facilities are located at the borders of the echelons to facilitate the consolidation and transshipment of goods between ech-elons. Examples of two-echelon distribution systems include express delivery, grocery and hypermarket products distribution, multi-modal freight transportation, city logistics, and e-commerce and home de-livery services. In recent years, the body of literature on the 2E-VRP has expanded significantly. Over 60 research papers have appeared in the scientific literature so far, which underlines both the academic and practical relevance of 2E-VRPs. In this review, we structure and revise all literature on the 2E-VRP. Math-ematical formulations, exact and heuristic solution methods, and benchmark datasets used to test and evaluate new algorithms are reviewed and discussed. This survey concludes with a selected list of open research areas on 2E-VRPs.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available