4.7 Article

Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and pharmacophore model analysis of novel tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrazol derivatives as potential TRKs inhibitors

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113627

Keywords

TRK inhibitors; Anticancer; Selectivity; Pharmacophore model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A potent and selective TRK inhibitor 19m was developed through rational drug design strategy, which effectively inhibits the proliferation of TRK-dependent cell lines and shows good kinase selectivity and drug safety. The compound exhibits favorable pharmacokinetic properties and a pharmacophore model guided by experimental results is proposed to help researchers find TRK inhibitors more efficiently.
The tropomyosin receptor kinases TRKs are responsible for different tumor types which caused by NTRK gene fusion, and have been identified as a successful target for anticancer therapeutics. Herein, we report a potent and selectivity TRKs inhibitor 19m through rational drug design strategy from a micromolar potency hit 17a. Compound 19m significantly inhibits the proliferation of TRK-dependent cell lines (Km12), while it has no inhibitory effect on TRK-independent cell lines (A549 and THLE-2). Furthermore, kinases selectivity profiling showed that in addition to TRKs, compound 19m only displayed relatively strong inhibitory activity on ALK. These data may indicate that compound 19m has a good drug safety. Partial ADME properties were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Compound 19m exhibited a good AUC values and volume of distribution and low clearance in the pharmacokinetics experiment of rats. Finally, a pharmacophore model guided by experimental results is proposed. We hope this theoretical model can help researchers find type I TRK inhibitors more efficiently. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available