Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 676-681Publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00970-2
Keywords
-
Funding
- UK Economic and Social Research Council [ES/T00908X/1]
- ESRC [ES/T00908X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this paper, the authors investigate how the introduction of NIPT into routine prenatal care has raised ethical concerns, and how these concerns are discussed differently across England, France, and Germany due to their unique socio-political particularities and value systems. The comparative review focuses on arguments and regulations surrounding prenatal testing and reproductive choices, shedding light on the varying definitions and implementations of reproductive autonomy in each country.
Since 2019, England, France and Germany have started offering NIPT as a publicly funded second-tier test for common chromosomal aneuploidies (trisomy 21, 18 and/or 13). Despite these benefits, the introduction of NIPT into routine prenatal care also raises a number of ethical concerns. In this paper, we analyse how these issues are discussed differently across countries, echoing the different socio-political particularities and value-systems that shape the use and regulation of NIPT in a specific country. The international comparison between England, France and Germany shows how each country defines the principle of reproductive autonomy and weighs it against other principles and values, such as, human dignity, disability rights and the duty of care of health professionals. In terms of methodology, our literature review focuses on arguments and regulations of prenatal testing and reproductive choices (specifically on NIPT), through the investigation of regulatory, parliamentary, scientific, medical, association, institutional and media sources. The comparative review helps to better understand ethical questions discussed with regard to NIPT, and, more broadly, to prenatal genomic testing, and the limits associated with reproductive autonomy in the three countries studied. Whereas reproductive autonomy is valued in each country, it is understood and implemented differently depending on the socio-cultural context, and on what other principles are evoked and how they are defined.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available