4.5 Review

Understanding the assumptions underlying Mendelian randomization

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Medicine, General & Internal

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration

Veronika W. Skrivankova et al.

Summary: Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies provide insights into causal effects of modifiable exposures on health outcomes, but are often hindered by inadequate reporting. Reporting guidelines like STROBE-MR help authors communicate critical information clearly and transparently, aiding in evaluating the quality of published studies for readers, reviewers, and journal editors.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach

Ioan Gabriel Bucur et al.

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2020)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Exploiting horizontal pleiotropy to search for causal pathways within a Mendelian randomization framework

Yoonsu Cho et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2020)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Contextualizing selection bias in Mendelian randomization: how bad is it likely to be?

Apostolos Gkatzionis et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Selection Bias When Estimating Average Treatment Effects Using One-sample Instrumental Variable Analysis

Rachael A. Hughes et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Editorial Material Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

A Practical Guide to Selection Bias in Instrumental Variable Analyses

Sonja A. Swanson

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Mendelian randomization analysis using mixture models for robust and efficient estimation of causal effects

Guanghao Qi et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2019)

Review Biology

A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies

Melinda C. Mills et al.

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY (2019)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

The challenging interpretation of instrumental variable estimates under monotonicity

Sonja A. Swanson et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization

Hans van Kippersluis et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Review Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies

Gibran Hemani et al.

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data

Zhihong Zhu et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2018)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Diagnostics for Pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomization Studies: Global and Individual Tests for Direct Effects

James Y. Dai et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates

Stephen Burgess et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Common Methods for Performing Mendelian Randomization

Alexander Teumer

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE (2018)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Nature as a Trialist? Deconstructing the Analogy Between Mendelian Randomization and Randomized Trials

Sonja A. Swanson et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method

Stephen Burgess et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption

Fernando Pires Hartwig et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies: a methodological review

Adam J. Streeter et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy

Jessica M. B. Rees et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2017)

Article Nutrition & Dietetics

Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the design, analysis, and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies

Philip C. Haycock et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Beyond Mendelian randomization: how to interpret evidence of shared genetic predictors

Stephen Burgess et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Article Economics

Genetic markers as instrumental variables

Stephanie von Hinke et al.

JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2016)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies

George Davey Smith et al.

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS (2014)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

The effect of non-differential measurement error on bias, precision and power in Mendelian randomization studies

Brandon L. Pierce et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Use of Mendelian randomisation to assess potential benefit of clinical intervention

Stephen Burgess et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2012)

Article Economics

MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION: THE USE OF GENES IN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ANALYSES

Stephanie von Hinke Kessler Scholder et al.

HEALTH ECONOMICS (2011)

Review Medical Laboratory Technology

Mendelian Randomization in the Era of Genomewide Association Studies

Patrick M. A. Sleiman et al.

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY (2010)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Negative Controls A Tool for Detecting Confounding and Bias in Observational Studies

Marc Lipsitch et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)