4.7 Article

Longitudinal prognostication in retroperitoneal sarcoma survivors: Development and external validation of two dynamic nomograms

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 291-300

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.008

Keywords

Soft tissue sarcoma; Retroperitoneal sarcoma; Survivor; Prognosis; Dynamic nomogram; Landmark analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop and validate dynamic nomograms for predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) after surgery. The nomograms showed good calibration and discrimination performance in predicting the 5-year survival probabilities at different time points during the first 5 years of follow-up in RPS survivors.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to create and validate dynamic nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at different time points during follow-up in patients who had undergone resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Methods: Patients with primary RPS operated upon between 2002 and 2017 at four and six referral centres comprised the development and external validation cohorts, respectively. Landmark analysis and multivariable Cox models were used to develop dynamic nomograms. Variables were selected using two backward procedures based on the Akaike information criterion. The prediction window was fixed at 5 years. Nomogram performances were tested in terms of calibration and discrimination on the development and validation cohorts. Results: Development and validation cohorts totalled 1357 and 487 patients (OS analysis), and 1309 and 452 patients (DFS analysis), respectively. The final OS model included age, landmark time (T-LM), tumour grade, completeness of resection and occurrence of local/distant recurrence. The final DFS model included T-LM, histologic subtype, tumour size, tumour grade, multifocality and the interaction terms between TLM and size, grade and multifocality. For OS, Harrell C indices were higher than 0.7 in both cohorts, indicating very good discriminative capability. For DFS, Harrell C indices were between 0.64 and 0.72 in the development cohort and 0.62 and 0.68 in the validation cohort. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Conclusion: Validated nomograms are available to predict the 5-year OS and DFS probability at different time points throughout the first 5 years of follow-up in RPS survivors. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available