4.7 Article

Everolimus or sunitinib as first-line treatment of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective study of the GETUG group (Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Genitales)

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.046

Keywords

Papillary renal cell carcinoma; Metastatic; Sunitinib; Everolimus; First-line treatment; Prognostic factors; Real world; IMDC risk groups

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that sunitinib and everolimus had similar efficacy in first-line treatment of patients with mpRCC, with no significant differences in PFS, DCR, PFS-2, and OS between the two treatment groups. Prognostic factors for OS included leukocytosis, anaemia, and the time from diagnosis to first systemic therapy, while there was no prognostic difference between pRCC subtypes.
Background: Two phase II trials (NCT00688753 and NCT00541008) reported efficacy data of sunitinib and everolimus in first-line treatment of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (mpRCC). Although most patients receive sunitinib or a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor in first-and second-line treatment, the optimal strategy remained unknown. Material and methods: In 23 centres of the Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Urogenitales group, after centralised pathological review, we analysed retrospectively progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with mpRCC treated in first-line treatment (PFS-1) with sunitinib or everolimus (primary end-point), PFS in second-line treatment (PFS-2), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), overall sequence and prognostic factors for OS (secondary end-points). Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients (119 men and 19 women), median age 62.5 years, with mpRCC type 1 (n = 24) or non-type 1 (n = 114), received first-line sunitinib (n = 107) or everolimus (n = 31). With a median follow-up of 92 months, we found no significant difference between the treatment groups in terms of PFS-1 (5.5 versus 6.2 months) and DCR (69% versus 83%). Ninety-eight patients received a second-line treatment, 69% with mTOR inhibitors after sunitinib and 100% with tyrosine kinase inhibitors after everolimus, with similar DCR (64% versus 58%), median PFS-2 (3.4 versus 4.8 months) and OS (16.0 versus 20.3 months). No factor was prognostic for PFS-1, whereas leukocytosis, anaemia and the time from diagnosis to first systemic therapy < 1 year were prognostic for OS. We found no prognostic difference between both pRCC subtypes. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Database Consortium risk factors were prognostic for OS. Conclusion: Sunitinib and everolimus had similar efficacy in first-line treatment of patients with mpRCC. 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available