Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages 1129-1151Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-022-04896-5
Keywords
Protein synthesis; Protein degradation; Intracellular pathways; Weight loss; Weight training; Anabolism
Categories
Funding
- Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This review investigates whether increasing resistance training volume during caloric restriction (CR) can help spare lean mass. The results show that higher resistance training volume (>= 10 weekly sets per muscle group) can reduce lean mass loss in female athletes, and increasing resistance training volume during CR appears to be more effective in reducing lean mass loss compared to reducing training volume. However, due to incomplete data on resistance training variables in the included studies, the current evidence is insufficient to conclude whether higher resistance training volume is better for sparing lean mass during CR.
Many sports employ caloric restriction (CR) to reduce athletes' body mass. During these phases, resistance training (RT) volume is often reduced to accommodate recovery demands. Since RT volume is a well-known anabolic stimulus, this review investigates whether a higher training volume helps to spare lean mass during CR. A total of 15 studies met inclusion criteria. The extracted data allowed calculation of total tonnage lifted (repetitions x sets x intensity load) or weekly sets per muscle group for only 4 of the 15 studies, with RT volume being highly dependent on the examined muscle group as well as weekly training frequency per muscle group. Studies involving high RT volume programs (>= 10 weekly sets per muscle group) revealed low-to-no (mostly female) lean mass loss. Additionally, studies increasing RT volume during CR over time appeared to demonstrate no-to-low lean mass loss when compared to studies reducing RT volume. Since data regarding RT variables applied were incomplete in most of the included studies, evidence is insufficient to conclude that a higher RT volume is better suited to spare lean mass during CR, although data seem to favor higher volumes in female athletes during CR. Moreover, the data appear to suggest that increasing RT volume during CR over time might be more effective in ameliorating CR-induced atrophy in both male and female resistance-trained athletes when compared to studies reducing RT volume. The effects of CR on lean mass sparing seem to be mediated by training experience, pre-diet volume, and energy deficit, with, on average, women tending to spare more lean mass than men. Potential explanatory mechanisms for enhanced lean mass sparing include a preserved endocrine milieu as well as heightened anabolic signaling.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available