4.2 Article

GaAs on Si substrate with dislocation filter layers for wafer-scale integration

Journal

ETRI JOURNAL
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 909-915

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.4218/etrij.2021-0003

Keywords

bowing; heteroepitaxy; metalorganic chemical vapor deposition; threading dislocation density

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated the growth of GaAs on Si using various Si substrate thicknesses and three types of dislocation filter layers (DFLs). It was found that Si substrate thickness mainly determines the wafer-scale bowing, while DFLs can effectively reduce the threading dislocation density (TDD). Additionally, the strained DFLs were effective in blocking the propagation of TDD on the Si substrate, allowing for large-scale integration of GaAs with less bowing and low TDD.
GaAs on Si grown via metalorganic chemical vapor deposition is demonstrated using various Si substrate thicknesses and three types of dislocation filter layers (DFLs). The bowing was used to measure wafer-scale characteristics. The surface morphology and electron channeling contrast imaging (ECCI) were used to analyze the material quality of GaAs films. Only 3-mu m bowing was observed using the 725-mu m-thick Si substrate. The bowing shows similar levels among the samples with DFLs, indicating that the Si substrate thickness mostly determines the bowing. According to the surface morphology and ECCI results, the compressive strained indium gallium arsenide/GaAs DFLs show an atomically flat surface with a root mean square value of 1.288 nm and minimum threading dislocation density (TDD) value of 2.4 x 10(7) cm(-2). For lattice-matched DFLs, the indium gallium phosphide/GaAs DFLs are more effective in reducing the TDD than aluminum gallium arsenide/GaAs DFLs. Finally, we found that the strained DFLs can block propagate TDD effectively. The strained DFLs on the 725-mu m-thick Si substrate can be used for the large-scale integration of GaAs on Si with less bowing and low TDD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available