Journal
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 261, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107556
Keywords
Abiotic forces; Ammophila arenaria; Ammophila breviligulata; Bioprotection; Cakile maritima; Flume; Panicum amarum; Storm; Wind tunnel; Drag coefficient; Coastal dunes
Categories
Funding
- NSF-OCE [1756449, 1756477, 1756714]
- DODNDSEG [FA9550-11-C-0028]
- USACE-ERDC/USGS
- NSF-CMMI-NHERI [1519679]
- Directorate For Geosciences
- Division Of Ocean Sciences [1756714] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Directorate For Geosciences
- Division Of Ocean Sciences [1756477, 1756449] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the effects of wind and wave run-up on coastal dune vegetation, finding that plant height and number of leaves are important predictors of plant response in wind and run-up experiments.
Vegetation is an important feature of coastal dunes and is often managed to stabilize restored dunes and provide coastal protection. Despite a high investment in planting and management efforts, little is known about how vegetation is affected by wind and wave run-up. The objectives of this study were to 1) investigate the lift forces and drag moments experienced by coastal dune vegetation from wind and wave run-up and 2) relate them to flow properties and plant morphology. Panicum amarum, Ammophila breviligulata, A. arenaria and Cakile maritima were subjected to laboratory wind and wave run-up conditions. Measurements were taken of fluid velocity, runup depth, Reynolds number, and plant biophysical properties. The plant lift and drag responses were recorded with the use of a novel sensor designed to address the complexities induced by the flexibility and morphology of real vegetation under varying conditions. Regression analysis was used to describe the relationships between plant response and plant structure and flow properties. Experiments showed that wind induced a constant lift force and drag moment on plants over time, whereas run-up induced plant response was time-dependent. Plant height (R-2 = 0.64, p < 0.001) and number of leaves (R-2 = 0.67, p = 0.30) were the most important predictors of drag moment from wind and run-up experiments, respectively. Plant drag coefficients from wind (5.0 x 10(-4) to 3.6 x 10(-2)) and run-up (2.7 x 10(-3) to 1.7) were negatively correlated with flow turbulence, indicating that coastal dune plants likely have biophysical adaptations to the induced forces, such as a propensity for streamlining. In particular, our data suggests that tall and thin dune grasses are best adapted and used on the dune crest and fronts to mitigate wind energy, while low shrubby plants are best used on the backbeach or dune toe to reduce run-up energy. Our study provides valuable information on the ability of dune vegetation to interrupt flow, such that modelers and managers can better understand how to best protect coastlines.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available